Sabbath Observance: Cromwell was known for his strong adherence to the Protestant Sabbath, which prohibited various forms of entertainment and work on Sundays. This included activities like dancing, playing games, or attending theatrical productions, which were considered sinful. His strict enforcement of Sabbath observance drew criticism from those who felt that it was too restrictive and unnecessary.
Theater Censorship: Cromwell's government imposed censorship on theaters and other forms of public entertainment, believing that they promoted immorality and frivolity. Many actors and playwrights faced restrictions, and some were even imprisoned for violating these rules. This perceived suppression of artistic expression further contributed to the image of Cromwell as a killjoy.
Religious Intolerance: Cromwell and the Puritans generally held intolerant views towards other religious denominations, particularly Catholics and Anglicans. They sought to suppress these faiths, which they considered corrupt or heretical. This caused resentment and hardship for those who practiced different religious beliefs, leading some to view Cromwell as oppressive.
Political Opposition: As the leader of a faction that emerged victorious during the English Civil Wars, Cromwell faced political opposition from those who disagreed with his policies and methods of rule. Royalists, for instance, who supported the return of the monarchy, viewed Cromwell and the Puritans negatively, contributing to his image as a killjoy and a tyrannical usurper.
Comparison with the Restoration Era: The period after Cromwell's rule, also known as the Restoration Era, saw a relaxation of many of the moral and religious restrictions that had been in place during his time. The contrast between the austere Puritan rule and the subsequent cultural liberalization led some to view Cromwell in a more negative light, as a harbinger of repression.
It's important to note that not everyone shared this negative view of Cromwell. Many Puritans and supporters of the Commonwealth celebrated his leadership, considering him a pious and dedicated ruler. However, his moral and religious principles did make him a controversial figure in his time and in subsequent historical assessments.