History of Europe

Evolution and Creationism

We address, at a good time, a topic on everyone's lips, today even more so, after the barrage (or fabadon) of new followers of Creationism .

The Evolution of Species was written at the end of a century and the beginning of the next by Sir Chearles Darwin (known dolphin television). The bases for height divided by two of his theory are based on the following statement:

All current living beings (the dead are despised) have a series of ancestors before them in time, much dumber and uglier than the living being in question.

Darwin quickly established ties of kinship between species of similar physiognomy, always under the premise that the species called 'previous' was more stupid and more ugly than the 'later' species.

Thus, evolutionary lines are established between sponges and jellyfish, cephalopods and crustaceans, fish and lizards, reptiles and birds, apes and hominids and so on until a long list is completed.

At the same time, it is ensured that all current living beings descend directly from the dumbest and ugliest species found so far, a unicellular organism Silly to rage and ugly to say enough.

Said being would pass along the chronological line of life through the different stages of intelligence (or stupidity) and beauty (or feura) dividing its evolutionary line into an infinity of branches , of which some stagnated their evolution (hence today there are stupid and ugly beings) and others continued and continue their evolution in a uneven way .

This complex theory collides head-on with the Creationist current whose staunch defense of a beautiful being and intelligent leaves the rest of the species in little less than experiments of nature or even of God .

We jump, then, to the opposite line...

We talk about Creationism , a theory that emerged spontaneously at some point in one century and the beginning of the next.

The foundations of Creationism were laid by being tired on your feet. A book, today called Bible , spontaneously appeared on a spontaneously made table in a tiny spontaneous house in the town of Kaboom, in the convulsiveSpontaneous Middle East . In this book, in its first and spontaneous part, the origin of many species of spontaneous living beings is recounted, those known by the people of the end of that century.
Obviously, this that could seem to leave aside some of the species known today and being therefore the negation of their existence is not such; simply the first spontaneous version of the Bible is a reduced version and told to the people , not a complete science-infused treatise on all forms of life.

Therefore, we can define Creationism as a "theory that ensures that each and every one of the living beings was created and in turn will be destroyed in a spontaneous way and place by an almighty superior being whom we will call God" .

Some scientists (the vaguest) fervently follow this current today and argue that it is not necessary to elaborate hundreds of treaties to define the origin of each species when it is clear that they were created spontaneously by God's whim or necessity.

Other scientists, on the contrary, argue that this theory has no basis on which to sustain and even incurs numerous contradictions, namely:

  • Is God capable of creating a being more powerful than himself? This question denies in any of its answers the omnipotence of the Divine Being.
  • Is God capable of creating a rock that even He himself cannot lift? We are facing the same previous dilemma.
  • What the hell moved God to create the platypus?

The main principle of this theory focuses precisely on the human being , created, unlike the rest of living beings, in the image and likeness of God. In this way they explain, throwing the Evolutionist principle to the ground, that there are human beings much more ugly and much more silly than its predecessors.