1. Absence of a clear national interest: The US did not perceive a direct threat to its national interests in the Bosnian conflict. It was preoccupied with other foreign policy challenges, such as the Gulf War, the post-Cold War restructuring of Europe, and the rise of terrorism.
2. Complexity of the conflict: The Bosnian conflict was a complex ethnic and religious conflict involving multiple factions, including Bosnian Muslims, Serbs, and Croats. Intervention would require a deep understanding of the historical context and a delicate balancing act to avoid further escalation.
3. Lack of international consensus: There was no clear international consensus on how to resolve the conflict or what role the US should play. The United Nations was already engaged in peacekeeping efforts, and some European countries were also involved, but there was no unified strategy.
4. Potential for mission creep: The US feared that intervening in Bosnia could lead to a prolonged and costly commitment, with no clear exit strategy. There was concern that the conflict could draw the US into a wider Balkan conflict, involving other countries in the region.
5. Domestic opposition: There was significant opposition to US intervention in Bosnia within the American public and among some members of Congress. Many argued that the US should focus on domestic issues and not get involved in another foreign conflict.
However, as the conflict intensified and reports of human rights abuses emerged, the US eventually became more involved, providing humanitarian assistance, air support, and eventually deploying ground troops as part of a NATO-led peacekeeping force.