Arguments in favor of Napoleon being a true son of the Revolution:
* He was a product of the revolution, rising from obscurity to become emperor through his military successes.
* He embodied many of the revolutionary ideals, such as the meritocracy, the rejection of aristocracy, and the promotion of equality and liberty.
* He sought to spread the values of the revolution throughout Europe, which led to the Napoleonic Wars.
* He introduced the Napoleonic Code, which was a major step forward in codifying and unifying French law.
Arguments against Napoleon being a true son of the Revolution:
* He became increasingly authoritarian and centralized power in his own hands, which contradicted the revolutionary ideals of liberty and democracy.
* He abandoned many of the revolutionary reforms, such as the redistribution of land and the abolition of slavery.
* He made peace with many of the old royalist and aristocratic families.
* He ultimately restored a form of monarchy with himself as emperor.
Ultimately, whether or not Napoleon was a true son of the French Revolution is a matter of opinion. There is no single, definitive answer, and historical scholarship on the topic is divided.